Yes I know, some people have far too much time on their hands and it has become common amongst grant seeking academics to hang their latest research on popular culture, especially if they can make it a bit controversial.
Asterix history debunked but Gaul myth will endure
The Asterix comic books, first created in 1961, have done much to mould popular beliefs about the Gauls through their diminutive, moustachioed hero and his corpulent sidekick Obelix.[Ed. ‘Well covered’]But the books by René Goscinny and illustrated by Albert Uderzo have got it almost all wrong, according to the exhibition "Les Gaulois" under way at Paris' Cite des Sciences.For a start, the Gauls were not forest dwellers but lived in complex towns and villages, aerial archaeology suggests, clearing woodland to raise cattle, sheep and pigs, and farming cereal.
But then we come to

What!!!!!
Any fule kno that Obelix is a Menhir sculptor and delivery man , he wouldn’t know a dolmen even if the sky were to fall on his head
I guess the author has never read an Asterix book in his life either that or perhaps he is a Roman and as everyone knows “These Romans are crazy”

As a ‘well covered’ gentleman myself, I feel it is my duty to point out another example of ignorant, not bothered to research journalism.
ADDENDUM
Something I didn’t know, that literally made me smile.
Something I didn’t know, that literally made me smile.
Obelix's name is a pun on the French word obélisque (obelisk), suggested by rotund physique and his habit of casually carrying heavy stone monuments (menhirs) around with him. In fact "obelisk" is also (in both French and English) a variant of the word obelus (obèle), a typographical mark ("†") often found in a companion role to that of the asterisk, after which his friend Asterix is named. [Ed. Nice]
Very, very clever and a huge tip of the hat to René Goscinny and Albert Uderzo, the Asterix books from my youth still find their way into the bathroom on occasion when there is a shortage of reading materiel.
10/10 for interesting - esoteric Asterix trivia this week and C S Lewis on theology last; that course is evidently bringing out your inner intellectual!
ReplyDeleteAs for the reseachers not knowing their dolmens from their menhirs, it is presumably because they were far too dull as children to enjoy a good Asterix book.
There's something about living in a hotel room that provokes deep thoughts. I'm hoping to have a proof of the unified field theory by Christmas
ReplyDeleteUnified field theory? Sorry, mate, looks like LOCOG got there first:
ReplyDeletehttp://thylacosmilus.blogspot.com/2011/11/well-thanks-for-one-thing-london.html
But unlike Tintin, I have always believed in Asterix, for a long while it was the only thing that made sense. But then these days there is not much that does.
ReplyDeleteNice one. Puts me in mind of this from the 'graph, several thousand years ago:
ReplyDeleteWhich do you prefer - cats or dogs? The Beatles or the Rolling Stones? Tintin or Asterix? Think carefully. Your answers will give away your character. These questions have been burning their way round New Year dinner tables and the answers are staggeringly uniform.
"Practically everybody answers cats, the Beatles and Tintin, or dogs, the Rolling Stones and Asterix. The implications for your character are clear: the cats/Beatles/Tintin fans tend to the meticulous and unadventurous; the dogs/ Rolling Stones/Asterix lot are outspoken and edgy".
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3585978/The-great-question-of-our-age-Tintin-or-Asterix.html)